The question behind “Review records rejected for an unsupported category value” is what the visitor can safely understand from the listing. Start with the confirmed arrangement, identify the affected field and keep any qualification alongside it. A longer description is useful only when it helps explain this particular directory import quality decision.
Set the boundary of this directory import quality check
To review records rejected for an unsupported category value, first distinguish the affected public detail from neighbouring information that serves a different purpose. Inspect the raw file and the target field mapping before submitting a bulk update. Record the question in ordinary language before editing. This keeps the review focused when several profile fields appear to need attention, and lets a second person understand why this change is being proposed.
Build a usable source note
The source note for “Review records rejected for an unsupported category value” should identify raw import values and field-level transformation rules, the relevant date or version if known, and the person able to confirm the arrangement. Preserve identifiers as text where necessary and reconcile accepted records with rejected or missing rows after the import. Keep a source claim separate from the wording you plan to publish. When one part remains unconfirmed, write down that gap explicitly instead of allowing the rest of the evidence to imply that everything has been established.
Test the likely misunderstanding
Consider “Review records rejected for an unsupported category value” as a hypothetical editing exercise: a hypothetical repair workshop also sells a few accessories. That occasional activity does not by itself establish that a broad retail category describes its main business. This is an illustrative decision test, not a report about a real business. Ask the directory data editor to explain which part of the current display could produce that misunderstanding and which supported detail would prevent it. A cosmetic rewrite alone may leave the underlying confusion intact.
Prepare the public-facing change
For the actual edit to review records rejected for an unsupported category value, preserve the smallest useful distinction and avoid changing unrelated approved facts. Compare the category definition with the current principal activity and document the fit. If the platform supports a dedicated field, use it for its intended purpose. Where explanatory text is needed, put the qualification close to the information it limits; visitors should not need to discover it in an unrelated section.
Finish with a reproducible check
Treat “Review records rejected for an unsupported category value” as complete only after reviewing what the public record now shows. Compare the saved result with raw import values and field-level transformation rules, including any formatting or truncation introduced by the platform. Record the affected field, the visible outcome and any remaining question for the directory data editor. A submitted update and a visible correction are separate milestones; retain the distinction so that a later editor does not assume a pending change is already live.
Before marking this task complete
- Can a new visitor understand the result of “Review records rejected for an unsupported category value”?
- Is the relevant directory import quality detail supported by raw import values and field-level transformation rules?
- Are the directory data editor’s unresolved questions kept separate from the approved change?